Sarbox, ITIL, Documentation and User management processes...
Bookmark :
On a recent visit to a very large site, they stated that they were Sarbanes Oxley complaint, and it was an enormous Pain In the Ass to update the dammed documentation. To such an extent that it seriously prevented them overhauling processes. Life was just too short.
Which then leads me to this rather interesting idea. Our product - FirM - is a user and group proxy administration tool for Lotus Domino, Active Directory and BlackBerry. Only one of our customers (so far) is Sarbox, and a number of potential customers are ITIL or Sarbox compliant. And a big issue is that our software is complex, and its a complete PITA to document stuff - especially if we add new features, change screens, etc.
Which brings me to the point (finally) of this post. What kind of documentation would someone want to spit out of an automated User ID provisioning, group resource managing, proxy administration system? Something suitable to slay the dragon of the Sarbox guys ? And would you want it to be flexible, so that you could add stuff to it ? It would be very useful to see pointers on what folks have already done, or to some standards based stuff, so I could understand the level required...







Comments
Posted by Duncan Anderson At 12:26:39 On 01/12/2008 | - Website - |
What is comes down to is Four things.
Process and SOP. Having the right documentation which tells you what to do and the right process with which to do the work. i.e. change request->authority to exectue->execution log->close request
Secondly it's about audit trail and confirmation. What was changed by whom, when and what the original data was.
Thirdly it's about security and anti tamper. I.e. the processes are carried out by whomever you said it was and authorised by whomever it said it was and was not changed between time of creating, logging and reading.
Finally you'll gather it's a shedload of information you are generating. Therefore you need to be able to Archive the logs and audit trails in such a way that they can be rebuilt and "traced" in the event of an audit.
Hope this helps.
Posted by NeilT At 13:35:09 On 01/12/2008 | - Website - |
'Sarbanes Oxley complaint'
ROFL!
Posted by Lars Berntrop-Bos At 15:22:12 On 01/12/2008 | - Website - |
Neil. After working for a Pharma, I thought I'd exclude them without a trillion dollar surcharge for putting up with the crap thats generated by Government in their industry. Like everyone else there.
---* Bill
Posted by Bill At 21:54:22 On 01/12/2008 | - Website - |
"Validation is a Tree Killing pain in the ass".
I concur.
Posted by NeilT At 14:41:15 On 02/12/2008 | - Website - |
Posted by newstar At 09:22:26 On 02/01/2009 | - Website - |
Posted by newstar At 09:22:28 On 02/01/2009 | - Website - |