Comments

1 - The 1.1 beta of Firebug does... installed it and it seems stable enough so far. Haven't tested it against anything particularly DOM-heavy yet, though.

Posted by Tim Tripcony At 22:39:00 On 17/06/2008 | - Website - |

2 - Actually, I installed Firebug 1.2.0b3. Seems nice enough so far...

Posted by Miha Vitorovic At 07:36:26 On 18/06/2008 | - Website - |

3 - Bill, I've just installed firebug 1.2.0b3 via the firefox addon site. Looks good!

Posted by Dennis van Remortel At 07:37:35 On 18/06/2008 | - Website - |

4 - Oh, but I have problems with Tabbrowser Preferences plugin (can't find the 3.0 compatible version).

Posted by Miha Vitorovic At 07:37:36 On 18/06/2008 | - Website - |

5 - Instead of chiming in re Firebug, I'll just provide a link

{ Link }

Posted by Ben Poole At 08:18:56 On 18/06/2008 | - Website - |

6 - Woops. And here's me not even looking for the beta one..

--* Bill

Posted by Wild Bill At 08:41:17 On 18/06/2008 | - Website - |

7 - Well, we noticed an error message when using DWA 8 and Firefox 3.0... we found a technote(1269539)that didnt fix the problem so we contacted IBM support who told us the following great news:

Unfortunately, our policy does not include support of Firefox 3.0 at this time. Most likely, this will be addressed in the future, in a cumulative fix.

The only thing I can offer at this time, is to either rollback Firefox to 2.x, or have your users use IE.

Posted by Chris Coppola At 22:13:11 On 18/06/2008 | - Website - |

8 - And it gets a critical bug in the first 5 hours.

{ Link }

OK it's prettier and a little faster, the links now open in the main tab not the sidebar (thanks), however Logmein sucks badly still. The java applet is simply CRAP.

Perhaps they should integrate ActiveX support then they'd have it all.....

Posted by NeilT At 12:08:33 On 19/06/2008 | - Website - |

9 - ActiveX? Few words in the IT world scare me more than that one.

Posted by Pedro Quaresma At 13:26:38 On 19/06/2008 | - Website - |